The Impact Of Working Capital Management And Ratio Finance On Profitability In The Manufacture

Jan Horas Veryady Purba, Stanislaus Bandung Argoputro, Sri Intan, David HM Hasibuan, Hendra Setiawan

Abstract


The company's profitability is one of the magnets used by investors to invest their funds. Every investor who invests expects to profit from the investment he chooses in the long term. This advantage can be obtained if you look at the intricacies of the company's achievements in terms of profitability. One important component that is generally looked at as one of the causes that motivates investors to invest and becomes an acquisition in the courage of investors to take risks on the investment they have chosen is the value of the company's ROE (return on equity). Return on equity is identified as tied to the company's performance because this includes an illustration of the value of a company regarding the achievement of net income when viewed from the perspective of the equity it owns. The movement in the value of profitability should be the main focus for investors looking to invest their funds in the stock exchange. Therefore, the level of the company's ability to earn profits is one of the benchmarks against which investors should invest. The aim of the study was to determine the extent to which working capital management and financial ratios, namely account receivable turnover, working capital turnover, current ratio, and debt-to-equity ratio, have an effect on return on equity in basic and chemical industry sub-sectors companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2016–2021. The results of the study shows that Accounts Receivable Turnovers, Working Capital Turnovers, Current Ratio, and Debt to Equity Ratio to Return on Equity do not have a significant effect with a significance value of 0.919 > 0.05, and partially there is no significant effect on Return on Equity between Accounts Receivable Turnovers with a significance value of 0.9937 > 0.05, Working Capital Turnover with a significant value of 0.8594 > 0.05, Current Ratio (CR) with a significant value of 0.3650 > 0.05, and also partially there is no significant effect on the Debt to Equity Ratio with a significance value of 0.619 > 0.05.

 

Keywords—account receivable turnovers; working capital turnovers; current ratio; debt to equity ratio

Keywords


account receivable turnovers; working capital turnover; curremt artio; debt to equity ratio

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April 1955. (references)

Ambarwati, N, S. et al. 2015. Effect of Working Capital, Liquidity, Activities and Size Company to Profitability on Company Manufacturers Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. E – Undergraduate Journal Ak Ganesha University of Education, Department of Accounting, Undergraduate Program. Vol. 3, no. 1.

Alfiania, D. N. 2022. Influence current ratio And debt to assets ratio to returns on assets. Management Journal UNSIKA.Volume 14 (1): p 206 -212

Anjum, S. & Malik, Q. A. 2013. Determinants of corporate liquidity analysis of cash holdings. Journal of Business Management. Vol 7(2): matter 94-100.

Arinta W. R, Mardani, R. M, And Khalikussabir. 2020. Influence Management Capital Work And Ratio Finance To Profitability On Industry Manufacture Which Registered In Exchange Effect Indonesia (IDX) On Year 2017-2019. E–Management Research Journal, Faculty Management Study Program Economy and Unisma Business. Vol 1: pg 94.

Basuki, TA and Yuliadi, I. 2015. Electronic Data Processing (SPSS 15 and Eviews 7). Sleman: Danisa Media.

Berzkalne, I., & Zelgalve, E. 2014. Trade-off theory vs. pecking order theory– Empirical evidence from the Baltic countries. Journal of Economics and Social Development. Vol 1(1): pp. 22-32.

Berzkalne, I., & Zelgalve, E. 2014. Intellectual capital and company value. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 110: pp. 887-896

Brigham & Houston. 2015. Base – Base Management Finance Edition 11 Book 1.Jakarta: Salemba Four.

Brigham & Houston. 2017. The Basics Management Finance. Jakarta: Salemba Four.

Danmayasti. V., Judge. MZ 2021. “The Effect of Working Capital and Financial Ratios on the Profitability of Various Industrial Sectors on the Indonesian Stock Exchange Year 2018-2020”. SNAM Proceedings PNJ. Code Paper: SNAM 4433.

Dwiyanthi, N., Sudiartha, G. m 2017. "Influence Liquidity And Rotation Capital Work to Profitability on Company Manufacture Sector Consumer Goods Industry”. Unud Management E-Journal. Vol. 6, no. 9, thing: 4829-4856.

Etale, LM, & Bingilar, PF 2016. Liquidity management and profitability: A study of selected food and beverages companies in Nigeria. International Journal of Management Sciences. Vol 7(4): matter 217-225.

Fahmi, Irham. (2014). Analysis Performance Finance. Bandung : Alphabet

Fajriah, Y and Junady, E. 2021. Increasing Profitability Through Relationships Receivables Turnover and Fixed Assets Turnover PT. Gudang Garam Tbk Period 2010-2019. Journal Administration Business JAB. Vol 11(1): matter 22-28.

Ghozali, I. 2016. Application of Multivariate Analysis with the IBM SPSS 23 Program (Edition 8). Print to VIII. Semarang : Publishing Agency.

Gujarati. 2012. The Basics Economics. Jakarta: Salemba Four.

Hanaffie, BMY 2017. The effect of liquidity and solvency on profitability: The cases of public-listed consumer product companies in Malaysia. (Master's thesis). Accessed from http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/9865/

Hanafi, m m And Halim, A. 2016. Analysis Report Finance Edition Fifth.

Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN

Harahap, SS 2016. Critical analysis of financial reports. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Bond accountant Indonesia. 2014. Standard Accountancy Finance Per Effective 1 January 2015. IAI Indonesia.

Iqbal, m And Kurniawati, Y. 2020. Influence Rotation Assets Still And Working Capital Turnover on Profitability at PT.Alfa Sarana Human. Accurate Scientific Journal Accountancy. Vol 11(10: p 79-89.

Jumingan. (2014). Financial Report Analysis. Jakarta : PT. Literary Earth.

Cashmere. 2015. Financial Report Analysis. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Cashmere. 2016. Management Source Power Man (Theory And Practice). Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Homeland.

Cashmere, (2018). Management source Power man (theory And practice). Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Homeland.

Cashmere. 2019. Analysis Report Finance Edition First. Print Twelfth.

Jakarta: PT King Grafindo Homeland.

Ministry Finance Indonesia. 2022. Expansion Manufacture And Stability Price Domestic Supports Sustained Economic Recovery. [Accessed on date 27 September 2022]. Available on: www.kemenkeu.co.id.

Lokollo, Antonius. 2013. The Effect of Working Capital Management and Financial Ratios to Profitability on Industry Manufacture Which Registered in Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) 2011. Journal of Accounting. Vol 2(2): pp. 1-13.

Maming, R. 2018. The Effect of Working Capital Turnover on Profitability in Manufacturing Company Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Journal Management. Vol 4(2): pp 37-42.

Mansur, F., Maiyarmi, R., Prasetyo., E. 2017. The Effect of Working Capital Turnover, Rotation Asset And Effectiveness Use fund to Profit Clean. Journal of applied Accounting and Taxation. Vol.2(2): pg 93- 100.

Matondang, Z And Nasution, HF 2021. Practice Analysis Data : Processing Econometrics with Eviews and SPSS. Medan: Independent Creation.

Munawir, S. 2014. Analysis Report Finance. Yogyakarta : Liberty.

Nur Qolby. 2020. Down 43.53% throughout 2020, like this performance seven issuer sector industry base. [Accessed on date 32 August 2022]. Available on: http://.kompas.com.id

Ohman, P And Yazdanfar, D. 2014. The Impact of Cash Conversion Cycle on Firm Probability An Empirical Study Based on Swedish Data. International Journal of Managerial Finance. Vol 10(4): pp. 442-452.

Pandeirot, LB and Sumanti, ER 2021. Company Liquidity and Profitability Manufacturing in ASEAN+3. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTING. Vol. 23 (2): pp. 229-242.

Ponsian. N, Chrispina. K, Tago. G, Mkiibi. H. 2014. The Effect of Working Capital Management on Profitability. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences. Vol 2(6): pp 347-355.

Priatna, H And Juliani, N. L. 2018. Influence Rotation Assets Still And Rotation Receivables to Profitability. Accurate Journal Scientific Accountancy. Vol 9 (2): p 1-26.

Riyanto, B. 2013. The Basics Expenditure Company Edition Fourth.Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Sartono, A. 2012. Financial Management Theory and Applications 4th Edition. BPFE: Yogyakarta.

Shah, A., & Ilyas, J. 2014. Is the only negative profitability-leverage relationship support for the pecking order theory in case of Pakistani firms? The Pakistan Development Review. pp: 33-55.

Sianipar, S. And Ompusunggu, H. 2020. Influence Capital Work And Ratio Finance to Profitability on Company Manufacture in Exchange Effect Indonesia. AKRAB Journal CHAMPION. Vol 5 (3) p: 147-160.

Sihombing, OS 2022. Introduction Method Analysis Multivariate. Pekalongan: Publisher NEM.

Sukamulja, S. 2021. Corporate Financial Management Theory, Analysis and Application in Do Investment. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.

Sukma, DA 2017. Influence of Current Ratio, Deb to Equity Ratio, Profit Margin Against the Profit Growth of Lq 45 Companies Registered in Exchange Effect Indonesia Year 2011-2013. Semarang: Unnes.

dance, Robinson. 2012. Economy Regional Theory And Edition Application Revision. Jakarta : PT Literary Earth

Vans Horne, J.C And Wachowicz, J.M 2013. Principles Management Finance 3th Edition Book 1. Jakarta: Salemba Four.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v45.2.6389

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jan Horas Veryady Purba, Stanislaus Bandung Argoputro, Sri Intan, David HM Hasibuan, Hendra Setiawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.