Biological Evaluation Of Two Commercial Feeds In Sex-Separated Rearing System On KUB-2 Chicken Performance

Mohammad Hasil Tamzil, Budi Indarsih, Muhammad Aidil Fitriyan Fadjar Suryadi, I Gede Nano Septian, Nisa Atussholihah

Abstract


This study aimed to evaluate the biological performance of KUB-2 chickens reared under a sex-separated system and fed two different commercial diets. A 2 × 2 factorial randomized block design was employed using 120 one-day-old chicks consisting of 60 males and 60 females. The treatments were arranged based on sex and feed type, namely Charoen Pokphand and Malindo commercial feeds. Observed parameters included final body weight, weekly body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality. Data were analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA. The results revealed that sex significantly affected all performance parameters (p < 0.05), with male chickens showing superior growth performance and feed efficiency compared to females. Feed type had no significant effect on the measured variables (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant interaction between sex and feed type was detected, indicating that the effect of sex on performance was consistent across both feed types. The best biological performance was observed in male chickens fed the Malindo diet, which also showed the lowest mortality rate. These findings highlight the importance of sex-separated rearing systems in improving the productivity of KUB-2 chickens and suggest that both commercial feed types can be used effectively in production systems.

Keywords


KUB-2 chicken, feed type, sex separation, performance, feed efficience

Full Text:

PDF

References


. Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Shafi ME, Qattan SYA, Batiha GE, Khafaga AF, Abdel-Moneim AME, Alagawany M. Probiotics in poultry feed: A comprehensive review. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2022a Jan;106(1):183-199.

. Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Shafi ME, Qattan SYA, Batiha GE, Khafaga AF, Abdel-Moneim AME, Alagawany M. Poultry nutrition and feed efficiency: Current advances and future perspectives. Animals. 2022b Feb;12(3):350.

. Kpomasse CC, Tona K, Youssao AKI. Broiler production challenges and feed efficiency optimization: A review. Animals. 2021 Mar;11(3):892.

. Mignon-Grasteau S, Narcy A, Rideau N, Chantry-Darmon C, Boscher MY, Sellier N, Chabault M, Konsak-Ilievski B, Gabriel I, Le Bihan-Duval E. Impact of selection for digestive efficiency on poultry performance and physiology. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2015 Dec;71(4):663-678.

. Sartika T, Iskandar S, Tiesnamurti B. Genetic improvement of Kampung chickens through the development of KUB chickens in Indonesia. Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2016 Mar;26(1):1-10.

. Shim MY, Song E, Billard L, Aggrey SE, Pesti GM, Sodsee P. Effects of sex and feeding strategies on growth performance and carcass characteristics in chickens. Poultry Science. 2018 Apr;97(4):1235-1245.

. Zuidhof MJ, Schneider BL, Carney VL, Korver DR, Robinson FE. Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957 to 2013. Poultry Science. 2014 Dec;93(12):2970-2982.

.. Listyasari D, Ismoyowati, Mugiyono S. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of male and female KUB chickens. Biodiversitas. 2022 May;23(5):2487-2493.

. Pham TN, Nguyen HT, Bui AA. Sex differences in growth performance and feed efficiency of slow-growing chickens under tropical conditions. Veterinary World. 2022 Apr;15(4):1021-1028.

. Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Paswan C, Padhi MK, Niranjan M, Chatterjee RN. Comparative evaluation of growth performance in improved indigenous chicken varieties. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2017 Nov;87(11):1408-1413.

. Sogunle OM, Adeleye OO, Bello KO, Fanimo AO. Influence of sex and feeding regime on growth performance of indigenous chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2020 Dec;52(6):3207-3214.

. Sugiharto S, Yudiarti T, Isroli, Widiastuti E, Wahyuni HI. Effect of commercial feed types on growth performance and intestinal health of native chickens. Veterinary World. 2021 Jun;14(6):1578-1585.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v58.1.8275

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Hasil Tamzil

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.