Assessment of Administrators Adoption of Funding Strategies for Resource Improvement in South-South Universities

Alphonsus Patrick Udoh, Prof. Nkechi Ikediugwu



This study examined administrators’ adoption of funding strategies for resource improvement in South-South Universities. Evaluative survey was adopted for the study. A total of 670 instruments (Federal Universities 366; state universities 304) were successfully returned. These formed the final sample size. Three research questions were answered while five hypotheses were tested in the study at 0.05 alpha level of significance. The instrument for data collection was a questionnaire titled: Assessment of Administrators Adoption of Funding Strategies for Resource Improvement Questionnaire. Mean was used to answer the research questions, the aggregate mean for each cluster were computed separately for federal and state universities respondents on each research question. Research questions were answered using mean scores while hypothesis where tested using  statistical package for social sciences to compare the variability of scores among respondents. The decision rule was to reject a null hypothesis where the significant value was greater than or equal to the alpha value and where the alpha value was less than the significant value, the null hypothesis was not rejected. Some of these endowment strategies include establishment of investment policies specially for endowment fund, create written spending policy etc. Among the recommendations made were; both administrators in federal and state universities should simplify the available endowments income provided to prospective donors and administrators in the universities, the state Universities most especially should employ the available commercial sources, as a way of funding the universities without the students really involved in the cost.

KEYWORDS: Evaluative  Aggregate  Investment  Endowment  Cost


Evaluative Aggregate Investment Endowment Cost

Full Text:




Akpan, C. P. (2011). Fundamentals of school business management. Calabar, Princechoic Consult.

Brennan, J., King, R., & Lebeau, Y. (2004). The role of universities in the transformation of societies. An International Research Project. London.

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 2: 313 – 330

Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016) National policy on education, Lagos: Federal ministry of Education press.

Gamoran, A., W. Secada & Marrett, C. (2000), The organizational context of teaching and learning: changing theoretical perspectives. In M. Hallinan (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Education, Springer, New York.

National Universities Commission. (2016a).About us. National universities commission. Retrieved from

National Universities Commission. (2019). About us. National universities commission. Retrieved from

Okai,O. N. & Ndukuru,Y.A. (2014). Resources management: A tool for higher institutions goal attainment,the case of rivers state. African Journal of higher education studies and development(AJHESD). The international Journal of theory, policy, and practice for sustainable development. Volume 2, 113-125.

Okuwa, O.B. (2008). Public-private partnership of higher education financing in nigeria: The case of user fees. East African Journal of Educational Research and Policy (EAJERP) Vol. 1, June 2007 and Vol.2, June 2008.

Sarah del Tufo ( 2002). "What is evaluation?". Evaluation Trust. The Evaluation Trust. Retrieved 13 May 2012

Udoh, G. (2008), Alternative sources of funding university education in Nigeria. An International multi-disciplinary Journal, 2 (3), 98-110.

Wood, M. S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54, 2:153 – 161.

Zamor, G. J. (2003) Micro bureaucaracy and development administration. International Review of Administrative Service.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Alphonsus Patrick Udoh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.