Post Thawing Survival Rate Of Human Embryos In Slow Freezing Versus Vitrification: A Narrative Review

Aishwarya Grace Unnikrishnan, Maryam Irshad Baqri, Navneeth Ranjith, Afifa Khaleelullah, Nazneen Naveed Sait, Madiha Bano Rehmani, Arjun Jay Prakash, Alina Grace Unnikrishnan

Abstract


The study compared the outcomes of slow-freeze and vitrification methods for oocyte cryopreservation, analyzing five randomized controlled trials, two cohort studies, and eight systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Slow-freezeis performed at room temperature using a buffered medium supplemented with gentamicin and human serum albumin. It contains 1.5 M 1,2-propanediol and 0.1 M sucrose. On the other hand, vitrification has been the preferred method since 2007. During vitrification, embryos are initially incubated in a solution consisting of 7.5% ethylene glycol and 7.5% dimethyl sulfide, both in Ham's F-10 media. This solution is further supplemented with 20% Albuminal-5. After the initial recovery, the oocytes are aspirated and immersed in a vitrification solution composed of Ham's F-10 medium for a duration of 50 to 60 seconds. The cooling is done via liquid nitrogen, and embryos are stored for months. The survival rate of embryos is the percentage of those that survive after being warmed up. Live birth rates are calculated as the percentage of live births per transferred embryo and warmed embryo. Embryos are selected by biopsy at the zygote or blastocyst stage using non-invasive methods to optimize the success rates of in vitro fertilization. Vitrification has a greater success rate, better survival rates, and transferable embryos, it is chosen for oocyte cryopreservation. Better clinical pregnancy rates and implantation capacity have also been linked to it, notably for blastocysts from In Vitro Maturation programs. To assess effects on neonatal outcomes and congenital abnormalities, additional study is necessary.

Keywords


Assisted human reproduction, Egg freezing, Cryosurvival, Infertility, Embryo survival assessment, vitrification, slow freezing, Cryoprotectant, Assisted reproductive technology, Post-thaw Implantation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


​[1] Rivas Leonel EC, Lucci CM, Amorim CA. Cryopreservation of Human Ovarian Tissue: A Review. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. 2019;46(3):173–81.

​[2] Argyle CE, Harper JC, Davies MC. Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):440–9.

​[3] Iussig B MRFGBSVACDUFRL. 2019 M 8. A brief history of oocyte cryopreservation: arguments and facts. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019.

​[4] Tavukcuoglu S, Al-Azawi T, Khaki AA, Al-Hasani S. Is vitrification standard method of cryopreservation. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2012 Sep;17(3):152–6.

​[5] Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Nov 8.

​[6] Gunnala V, Schattman G. Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: the past, present, and future. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;29(1):59–63.

​[7] Saragusty J, Arav A. Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification. REPRODUCTION. 2011 Jan;141(1):1–19.

​[8] Arav A, Natan Y. The Near Future of Vitrification of Oocytes and Embryos: Looking into Past Experience and Planning into the Future. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. 2019;46(3):182–7.

​[9] Chian RC, Wang Y, Li YR. Oocyte vitrification: advances, progress, and future goals. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Apr;31(4):411–20.

​[10] Li Y, Chen Z jiang, Yang H jun, Zhong W xia, Ma S ying, Li M. [Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;42(11):753–5.

​[11] Fasano G, Fontenelle N, Vannin AS, Biramane J, Devreker F, Englert Y, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Feb;31(2):241–7.

​[12] Sifer C, Sermondade N, Dupont C, Poncelet C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Hugues JN, et al. Issue de la vitrification des embryons précoces versus congélation lente. Rapport de la première naissance française. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012 Mar;40(3):158–61.

​[13] Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Human Reproduction. 2008 Jun 20;23(9):1976–82.

​[14] Gu F, Li S, Zheng L, Gu J, Li T, Du H, et al. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis. Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1788–98.

​[15] Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2794–801.

​[16] Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, De Vos A, Haentjens P, Blockeel C, Tournaye H, et al. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos. Human Reproduction. 2013 Nov 1;28(11):2943–9.

​[17] Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;21(3):270–4.

​[18] Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009 Jun;26(6):347–54.

​[19] Mastenbroek S, van der Veen F, Aflatoonian A, Shapiro B, Bossuyt P, Repping S. Embryo selection in IVF. Human Reproduction. 2011 May 1;26(5):964–6.

​[20] Debrock S, Peeraer K, Fernandez Gallardo E, De Neubourg D, Spiessens C, D’Hooghe TM. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: RCT. Human Reproduction. 2015 Aug;30(8):1820–30.

​[21] AbdelHafez FF, Desai N, Abou-Setta AM, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Feb;20(2):209–22.

​[22] Amorim CA, Curaba M, Van Langendonckt A, Dolmans MM, Donnez J. Vitrification as an alternative means of cryopreserving ovarian tissue. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Aug;23(2):160–86.

​[23] Lee S, Ryu KJ, Kim B, Kang D, Kim YY, Kim T. Comparison between Slow Freezing and Vitrification for Human Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Xenotransplantation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 8;20(13).

​[24] Jang TH, Park SC, Yang JH, Kim JY, Seok JH, Park US, et al. Cryopreservation and its clinical applications. Integr Med Res. 2017 Mar;6(1):12–8.

​[25] Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, Bontis I, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jul;90(1):186–93.

​[26] Cai H, Niringiyumukiza JD, Li Y, Lai Q, Jia Y, Su P, et al. Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Dec 6;16(1):123.

​[27] Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo, and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Nov 8.

​[28] Shi Q, Xie Y, Wang Y, Li S. Vitrification versus slow freezing for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-anlaysis. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8538.

​[29] Medicine AS in R. The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Aug;25(2):146–67.

​[30] Son WY, Tan SL. Comparison between slow freezing and vitrification for human embryos. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009 Jan 9;6(1):1–7.

​ ​




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v40.1.5511

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Aishwarya Grace Unnikrishnan, Maryam Irshad Baqri, Navneeth Ranjith, Afifa Khaleelullah, Nazneen Naveed Sait, Madiha Bano Rehmani, Arjun Jay Prakash

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.