South Caucasus at the Crossroads of Geo-Strategical Interests: New Era of Regional Security or New Challenges to Peace-Building?

Emil Ordukhanyan

Abstract


The paper explores the new situation emerged in South Caucasus region after the 44-days war in Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh). After the collapse of the Soviet Union, three conflicts broke out in South Caucasus, and none of them is not yet settled. This fact makes the region more unstable, deeply volatile and continually disintegrated. The political regimes of intra and extra-regional countries, especially regional autocratic ones, have a negative impact on conflict resolution and peace-building process in South Caucasus.

The whole potential of this region can't be revealed and exploited without settling frozen and/or unfrozen conflicts in Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Nagorno-Karabakh. The unsolved conflicts will lead to a permanent regional instability and uncertainty by giving chance to extra-regional actors for the use of their geo-strategical interests. The regional instability is transformed into a stable tool for the extra-regional actors, especially autocratic ones, to interfere and to keep pseudo-mediation by promoting their own interests.

The issues of regional communications’ unblocking, borders’ demarcation and delimitation as well as regional integration possibilities are discussed. The exploration of these issues showcased the need for a common platform or practically experienced concept of regional peace-building that have to be shared by all regional countries.


Keywords


South Caucasus, regional conflicts, the 44-days war in Nagorno-Karabakh, unblocking of communications, demarcation, delimitation, consociationalism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avdaliani, E., While the Cat’s Away: EU Advances South Caucasus Peace. Retrieved from: https://cepa.org/while-the-cats-away-eu-advances-south-caucasus-peace/, (July 14, 2022).

Avetisyan, A., EU Parliament condemns destruction of Armenian heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh. Retrieved from: https://oc-media.org/eu-parliament-condemns-destruction-of-armenian-heritage-in-nagorno-karabakh/, (March 10, 2022).

de Waal, Th., Unfinished Business in the Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict. Retrieved from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/02/11/unfinished-business-in-armenia-azerbaijan-conflict-pub-83844, (May 2, 2022).

Donfried, K., US deeply concerned about gas disruptions and Azerbaijan’s troop movements in Artsakh. Retrieved from: https://armenpress.am/eng/news/1078869.html, (March 25, 2022).

European Council Statements and remarks 14 December 2021. Statement of President Charles Michel following the trilateral meeting with President Ilham Aliyev and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. Retrieved from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2021/12/14/statement-of-president-charles-michel-following-the-trilateral-meeting-with-president-ilham-aliyev-and-prime-minister-nikol-pashinyan/, (June 14, 2022).

Galitsky, A., Peace on Azerbaijan’s Terms Won’t End the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Retrieved from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/08/25/peace-on-azerbaijans-terms-wont-end-the-nagorno-karabakh-conflict/, (April 17, 2022).

German, T., (2012). Contemporary Security Challenges in the book “Regional Cooperation in the South Caucasus. Good Neighbours or Distant Relatives?”. Routledge. 208 p.

Kakachia, K., (2011). Challenges to the South Caucasus regional security aftermath of Russian–Georgian conflict: Hegemonic stability or new partnership? Journal of Eurasian Studies 2, pp. 15-20.

Kaleji, V., The impact of the war in Ukraine on regional cooperation in the South Caucasus. Retrieved from: https://www.mei.edu/publications/impact-war-ukraine-regional-cooperation-south-caucasus, (June 8, 2022).

Khamenei warns Erdogan not to block the Iranian-Armenian border. Retrieved from: https://mediamax.am/en/news/region/48068/, (19.07.2022).

Kucera, J., Russia and Turkey open joint military center in Azerbaijan. Retrieved from: https://eurasianet.org/russia-and-turkey-open-joint-military-center-in-azerbaijan, (February 2, 2022).

Minister Looks Forward To EU Funding For Armenian Road Project. Retrieved from: https://www.azatutyun.am/a/31356555.html, (13.07.2021).

Ohanyan, A., (2021). The Road Not Yet Taken: Regionalizing US Policy Toward Russia. The Washington Quarterly, 44:4, pp. 29-47.

Ohanyan, A., & Kopalyan, N., (2022). How to Train Your Dragon: Armenia’s Velvet Revolution in an Authoritarian Orbit. Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2022), 55 (1), pp. 24-51.

Russian-Turkish cooperation in Nagorno-Karabakh was not a simple operation. Retrieved from: https://factor.am/349063.html, (20.01.2022).

Semercioğlu, H., (2021). The New Balance of Power in the Southern Caucasus in the Context of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in 2020. R&S -Research Studies Anatolia Journal, Vol:4, Issue: 1, pp. 49-60

Status of Nagorno-Karabakh must be determined through negotiations within framework of OSCE Minsk Group: Jonathan Lacôte. Retrieved from: https://www.1lurer.am/en/2021/07/23/Status-of-Nagorno-Karabakh-must-be-determined-through-negotiations-within-framework-of-OSCE-Minsk-G/522329, (23.07.2021).

Trenin, D., One Year On: Russia and the South Caucasus After the Karabakh War. Foreign and Security Policy. Retrieved from: https://carnegiemoscow.org/commentary/85811, (November 18, 2021).

Yüce, A., (2016). The Caucasus and The World. International Scientific Journal, Tbilisi, 21, pp. 56-64.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v33.2.4551

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Emil Ordukhanyan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.