Analysis of Risk Factors Related to the Events Domestic Violence (Qualitative Study on Women Victims of Violence During the Covid-19 Pandemic)

Lidia Hastuti, Ridha Mardiani, Annisa Rahmawati, Tri Wahyuni, Selly Kusumajaya, Kristalia Kristalia

Abstract


Cases of Domestic Violence  against women tended to increase to 299,911 cases throughout 2020 during the covid-19 pandemic happened. There was an increase about 69% from 1,413 cases in 2019 to 2,389 cases in 2020. Covid-19 has had a significant impact on social, economic and various other dimensions, and also has an impact on household stability. Economic hardship during the pandemic increased women's vulnerability to violence.. When household income is reduced, the tension in the household is high. Women will become targets for perpetrators of violence who often use financial difficulties as an excuse for violence. The qualitative research with a phenomenological approach to women to explore risk factors for domestic violence on women during the covid-19 pandemic. Data collection methods used in-depth interview and focus group discussions. The study with a total of 20 participants was selected by purposive sampling with sampling variations. The data analysis used thematic analysis. The results of the study found that the types of domestic violence which was experienced during the pandemic did not differ much from before the pandemic, namely; physical, verbal, psychological, economic and sexual violence. The risk factors for domestic violence are affair, economic factors, communication problems with couple, couple/husband's character/temper, social media, sexual desire and the phenomenon of women who preferred prosperous and married men. This study also found that religiosity was a factor to prevent domestic violence. Conclusion: the risk factors for domestic violence did not stand alone, but could be caused by several factors at the same time.

 


Keywords


types of violence, risk factors, domestic violence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ramsay, J., Richardson, J., Carter, Y.H., Davidson, L.L., Feder,G. 2002. Should health professionals screen women for domestic violence? Systematic review BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7359.314 (Akses Agustus 2018)

https://komnasperempuan.go.id/siaran-pers-detail/catahu-2020-komnas-perempuan-lembar-fakta-dan-poin-kunci-5-maret-2021

Andersson, N., Foster,A.H., Mitchell, S, Scheepers, E, Goldstein,S. 2007. Risk factor for domestic violence: National cross-sectional household survey in south african countries, BMC Women’s Health, 7:11 doi:10.1186/1472-6874-7-11

Demetrios, N., Kyriacou, M.D., Deirdre, A., Ellen, T., Susan, S., Toni, T., Judith, A.L., et al. 1999. Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence. The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 341. No. 25. p1892-1898 47

https://theconversation.com/angka-kdrt-di-indonesia-meningkat-sejak-pandemi-covid-19-penyebab-dan-cara-mengatasinya-144001).

Schumacher. S., Milan, J. H. M. 2001. Research in educational a conceptual introduction. 5 th. New York. Ddison Wesley Logman. Inc

Hancock. B. 1998, Reseacrh and development in primary health care, an introduction to qualitative research, Trent Focus Group. Division of General Practice University of Nottingham

Somantri, G. R. 2005. Memahami metode Office of Religious Affairslitatif, MAKARA, Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 9, No. 2, 57-65

Dodd, T. J. 2003. A guide to research ethics.

(http://www.lib.uconn.edu/DoddCenter/ASC/dodphot1.htm, Juli 2017)

Christians, Clifford G. 2000. Ethics and Politics in Qualitative Research, dalam Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.

Heriyanto, 2018. Thematic analysis sebagai metode menganalisa data untuk penelitian Office of Religious Affairslitatif ANUVA Volume 2 (3): 317-324, ISSN: 2598-3040 (https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234034028.pdf)

Maxwel, J. A. 1992. Understanding and validity in qualitative research, Harvard Educational Review; 62, 3; Research Library Core pg. 279

Salirawati D., Wiyarsi, A., Sulistyowati, E. 2013. Survei terhadap terjadinya kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) wanita karier di daerah istimewa yogyakarta. Jurnal penelitian humaniora, Vol. 18, No.1, April 2013: 61-69

Ramadani, m., Yuliani, F. 2015. Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) sebagai salah satu isu kesehatan masyarakat secara global. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Andalas. p-issn 1978-3833; e-issn 2442-6725. 9(2). p: 80-87

Eskawati, M.Y., Endarto, Y. 2017. Penyebab kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (kdrt) di kecamatan bantul kabupaten bantul yogyakarta Maria Yeny Eskawati. VisiKes Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. Vol. 16 No. 1. pp: 59-65

Yussar, M.O., Adamy, A., Marthoenis. 2019. Determinan kejadian kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) di kota banda aceh. Jukema. Vol. 5, no. 2, p: 432-437

Rofiah, N. 2017. Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dalam perspektif islam. wawasan: jurnal ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya 2, 1. p:31-44. ISSN 2502-3489 (online) ISSN 2527-3213 (print) https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jw/article/view/829/933




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v27.2.3275

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Lidia Hastuti1, Ridha Mardiani2, Annisa Rahmawati3, Tri Wahyuni4, Selly Kusumajaya5, Kristalia6

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.