The Effect of Age on Dialect Change: The Case of Diphthongs in a Saudi Dialect

Najla Manie Alghamdi

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to investigate the changes that occur in one of the Saudi dialects, that is Ghamdi variety. The researcher examined the speech of Ghamdi migrants in the city of Mecca within the framework of dialect contact. Those migrants migrated from Al-Baḥa, a rural area in the south-western region of Saudi Arabia, to the city of Mecca in the Hijazi region. The data was collected through sociolinguistic interviews with 49 Ghamdi speakers, and one social variable was used namely, age. The speakers were divided into four age groups 14- 29, 30- 45, 46- 61 and 62+. This investigation was motivated by the obvious linguistic differences between rural Ghamdi and urban Meccan dialects. Two linguistic variables were examined: the diphthongs (ai) and (aw). The results showed that Meccan features, the monophthongs [ɛ:] and [ɔ:], occur in all age groups of Ghamdi migrants. This indicates that there is a change in progress toward Meccan features. Furthermore, the results of this research manifested intermediate features in the speech of Ghamdis, that can be described as narrower diphthongs [ɛi] and [ɔu].   


Keywords


Dialect Contact, Migrants, Diphthongs, Sociolinguistic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu-Mansour, M. (1987). A Nonlinear Analysis of Arabic Syllabic Phonology, with Special Reference to Makkah. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Abu-Mansour, M. (1987). A Nonlinear Analysis of Arabic Syllabic Phonology, with Special Reference to Makkah. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Al-Ghamdi, K. (2008). Ghamid Tribe: Ancestors and History (2nd ed.). Dar Al-Muhadetheen.

Alghamdi, N. (2014). A sociolinguistic study of dialect contact in Arabia: Ghamdi immigrants in Mecca. PhD thesis, University of Essex, UK.

Al-Shehri, A. (1993). Urbanization and linguistic variation and change: A sociolinguistic study of the impact of urbanization on the linguistic behaviour of urbanized rural immigrants in Hijaz, Saudi Arabia. PhD thesis, University of Essex, UK.

Bakalla, M. H. (1979). The morphological and phonological components of the Arabic verb (Meccan Arabic). Lebanon: Longman.

Chambers, J. K. (1992). Dialect Acquisition. Langauge, 68(4), 673–705.

Chambers, j. K. &Trudgill. P. (1998). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ingham, B. (1971). Some Characteristics of Meccan Speech. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 34(2), 273– 297.

Jabeur, M. (1987). A Sociolinguistic Study in Tunisia: Rades. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.

Kabrah, R. (2004). Opacity and Transparency in The Phonology of Makkan Arabic: A Stratal Optimality-Theoretic Approach. PhD thesis, Boston University.

Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistic.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. The University of Pennsylvania Press.

Milory, L & Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Blackwell Publishing.

Prochazka, T. (1988). Saudi Arabian Dialects. London: Kegan Paul.

Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialect in Contact. Blackwell.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v18.1.2785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Najla Manie Alghamdi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.