The Influence Factors of Participatory Communication in the Development of Entrepreneurship Behavior in Enbal Casava Processing

Risyart Alberth Far Far, Amiruddin Saleh, Musa Hubeis, Djoko Susanto

Abstract


The people of Southeast Maluku district have their own uniqueness food compared to other communities in Indonesia by processing bitter cassava into traditional food which in the local language is called Enbal. The potential for developing enbal in increasing the people's income is responded by the local government by forming a small industrial group processing enbal. The purpose of this research is to describe the characteristics of the processing of waste, the availability of local food information, the support of institutional support, participatory communication and entrepreneurial behavior, and then to analyze the factors that influence participatory communication in the development of entrepreneurship behavior in the processing of enbal. The study was conducted in Southeast Maluku district by taking data conducted in a census of the entire population of small-scale processing industries in Southeast Maluku district, totaling 127 processors. Primary data collection techniques were carried out using a questionnaire and secondary data obtained from relevant agencies from the district government of Southeast Maluku. The results showed that the age of the processor is dominant in the productive category with a low level of education and adequate experience, a wide enough land area. In general, the majority of the level of motivation for the processing of enbal is in the high category and the level of the airport is low. The level of availability of local food information is not available. The level of institutional support for local small-scale food industry is not optimal because it is in the medium category. The level of participatory communication of the recipient processing has generally been participatory. Entrepreneurial behavior possessed by enbal processors in the district of maluku Tenggara is mostly in the high category. Factors that significantly and positively influence participatory communication are individual characteristics and institutional support. The participatory communication factor also significantly and positively influences entrepreneurial behavior Participatory communication is reflected by dialogue, voice, liberating-pedagogy, and reflection on action.

Keywords


Enbal processing, entrepreneurial behavior, participatory communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander IK, Beukel Karin. 2014. Perceptions of Followers? Performance, Self-identity and Communication Skills and Their Impact on Entrepreneurial Intention in a Developing Country Context. DRUID Society Conferencetion in a Developing Country Context. DRUID Society Conference 2014 CBS, Copenhagen, June 16-18.

Aminah, Sumardjo, Djuara Lubis, Djoko Susanto. 2014. Perubahan model komunikasi dan pergeseran paradigma pembangunan dalam perspektif sejarah Paramita. 24 (1): 92-103.

Bulu YG, Hariadi SS, Herianto AS, Mudiyono. 2009. Pengaruh modal sosial dan keterdedahan informasi inovasi terhadap tingkat adopsi inovasi jagung di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. J.AE. 27 (1): 1-21.

Far-Far R. 2011. Hubungan komunikasi interpersonal dengan perilaku petani dalam bercocok tanam padi sawah di Desa Waimital Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. Jurnal Budidaya Pertanian. 7(2):100-106.

Kashani, Somayeh Jangchi: Mesbah, Ardeshir; and Samira Mahmoodi. 2015. Analysis of Barriers to Agricultural Entrepreneurship Development From the Perspective of Agricultural Entrepreneurs in Qazvin Province. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences 5 (12) 47-55, 2015 ISSN: 2090-4274.

[Kementan] Kementerian Pertanian. 2016. Keputusan Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia Nomor 12/KPTS/KN.210/K/02/2016 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Gerakan Percepatan Penganekaragaman Konsumsi Pangan Tahun 2016. Jakarta (ID): Kementerian Pertanian.

Latan H, Ghozali I. 2015. Partial Least Square Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0. Semarang (ID): Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Leasa BW, Amanah S, Fatchiya A. 2018. Kapasitas pengolah ubi kayu “enbal” dan pengaruhnya terhadap keberlanjutan usaha di Maluku Tenggara. Jurnal Penyuluhan 14(1): 11-26.

Liliweri A. 2011. Komunikasi Serba Ada Serba Makna. Jakarta (ID): Kencana.

Meyer HW. 2005. The nature of information, and the effective use of information in rural development. Journal Information Research. 10 (2).

McElwee G. 2005. The Entreprising Farmer a Review of Enterpreneurship in Agriculture. The free press.

Pambudy R, Burhanuddin, Priatna WB, Rosiana N. 2011. Analisis Perilaku Wirausaha Mahasiswa Institut Pertanian Bogor. Di dalam : Nurmalina R, Priatna WB, Jahroh S, Nurhayati P, Rifin A, editor. Prosiding Seminar Penelitian Unggulan Departemen Agribisnis; 2011 Desember 7 dan 14; Bogor, Indonesia. Bogor (ID): Departemen Agribisnis Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor. hlm 179-196.

Pichardo. 2010. From Farmers to Entrepreneurs: The Importance Of Associate Behavior. IPN CII DIR Hornos Col Noche Oaxaca Mexico.

Purwatiningsih SD. 2015. Communication strategy for better understanding community on conservation forest at National Park Halimun Salak. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 6(2): 1933 - 2219 (Print), 2219-6021 (Online).

Ratnawati S. 2011. Model pemberdayaan perempuan miskin perdesaan melalui pengembangan kewirausahaan. J.Kewirausahaan. 5 (2): 1-9.

Ruhimat IS. 2014. Faktor-faktor untuk peningkatan kemandirian petani dalam pengelolaan hutan rakyat: studi kasus di Desa Ranggang, Kabupaten Tanah Laut, Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan. 11 (3): 237 – 249.

Satriani I, Muljono P, RWE Lumintang 2011. Komunikasi Partisipatif pada Program Pos Pemberdayaan Keluarga. Jurnal Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik. 9(2):17-27.

Sudarko. S. 2012. Tingkat Kemampuan Anggota Kelompok Tani Dalam Penerapan Inovasi Teknologi Usahatani Kopi Rakyat. Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics. 6(1): 1-11.

Tufte T, Mefalopulos P. 2009. Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide. Washington (US): World Bank.

Van Den Ban AW, Hawkins HS. 1999. Penyuluhan Pertanian. Yogyakarta (ID): Kanisius.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v21.2.1931

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Risyart Alberth Far Far, Amiruddin Saleh, Musa Hubeis, Djoko Susanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.