Decriminalization of Homosexuality
Abstract
s. 377 - Unnatural Offences
“Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.”
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code criminalizes several sexual activities such as homosexual acts. It was introduced more than a century ago during the British rule in India. In spite of being decriminalized by High Court once, the Supreme Court of India overturned the decision stating that it can be only be decriminalized by the legislature.
This is a paper that analyses the arguments in favor of as well as the arguments against the decriminalization of Homosexuality in India. The paper will also scrutinize some facts about Homosexuality and will finally arrive at the conclusion that it is fair to decriminalize Homosexuality.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajit Prakash Shah. (2009). Naz Foundation vs. Government of NCT of Delhi and others.
Lord John Wolfenden (chairman of committee). (1957). Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (Wolfenden Committee Report).
Voices Against Section 377. (2005). Rights for All: Ending Discrimination under Section 377.
G Singhvi. (2013). Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr vs Naz Foundation & Ors.
HT Correspondent. (2013). Hindustan Times, Online. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/ramdev-offers-to-cure-homosexuals-at-his-haridwar-ashram/story-UtnktIHM8qAdT5NKbG7QsO.html.
Ruth Vanita. (2002). Homosexuality in India: Past and Present.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v5.2.116
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Deevanshu Goyal, Sambhav Jain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.