The Validity of Assessment’s Instrument in Science Subject Based on Science Literacy for Junior High School

Wilvi Eko Saputra, Zulyusri .


The study aimed to determine the validity of science-based science literacy subject evaluation tool for first semester junior high school students in grade IX had been conducted. This type of research is development research using the Plump model development. The validity of science-based science literacy subject evaluation tools is carried out with 2 types of validity namely logical validity and empirical validity. Logical validity is carried out by 5 experts who assess the validity of the questions developed. Based on logical validity it is known that science questions based on science literacy that has been developed have met valid criteria with an average validity of 88.98%. Empirical validity is determined by calculating the value of the validity of each item by using the product moment formula. As many as 60 scientific literacy-based items developed for each question have different values of item validity according to the type of problem. From the results of the validity of the items as a whole obtained a value of 67.67% and included in the valid criteria. Based on the second value of this validity (logical and empirical validity) it can be concluded that the questions developed are included in the valid criteria with a validity value of 78.33%.


Validity, Evaluation’s Tool, Science Literacy, Science Subject.

Full Text:



Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., and Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89-117.

Adams, W. K, and Wieman, C. E. (2011).Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert‐like thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1289-1312.

Arikunto, 2012.Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Dillon, J. (2016). 17 On Scientific Literacy and Curriculum Reform. Towards a Convergence Between Science and Environmental Education: The Selected Works of Justin Dillon, 269.

De Boer GE. (2000). Scientific Literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.

Dragoş, V and Mih, V. (2015). Scientific Literacy in School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 167–172.

Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183-210.

Hahn, I., Schöps, K., Rönnebeck, S., Martensen, M., Hansen, S., Saß, S., and Prenzel, M. (2013). Assessing scientific literacy over the lifespan–A description of the NEPS science framework and the test development. Journal for Educational Research Online/Journal für Bildungsforschung Online, 5(2), 110-138.

Holbrook, J and M. Rannikmae. 2009. The meaning of science literacy (Journal). International Journal of Environmental dan Science Education Vol. 4, No. 3, July 2009, 275-288.

Kemendikbud. 2013. Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013. Paparan Mendikbud dlam Sosialinnsai.

Murti, P. R., & Aminah, N. S. (2018, September).The Analysis of High School Students’ Science Literacy Based on Nature of Science Literacy Test (NOSLiT). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012003). IOP Publishing.

Nbina, J and Obomanu. 2010. The Meaning of Scientific Literacy : A Model of Relevance in Science Education. The Online Journal Vol. 8.

Norris, S.P and Philips, L. 2003. “How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy”. International journal of science Education, 87 : 224-240.

Odja, A. H. dan C. S Payu. 2014. Analisis kemampuan awal literasi sains siswa pada konsep IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia

OECD, 2002.PISA 2000: Assesment or Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy

OECD, 2004.PISA 2003: Assesment Framework: mathematics, reading, science, and problem solving knowledge and skills.

OECD, 2006.PISA 2006: Science Literacy Framework.

OECD, 2009.PISA 2009: Assesment Framework Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics, and Science.

OECD, 2012.PISA 2012 Result: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I).

OECD. 2015. PISA 2015: Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematic, Reading, Science, Problm Solving and Financial Literacy.

Pamungkas, Z. S., Aminah, N. S., Nurosyid, F., and Wahyuni, S. (2018). Students Critical Thinking Skill in Solving Scientific Literacy using a Metacognitive Test Based on Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 161-169.

Patrick, L., Care, E., & Ainley, M. (2011).The relationship between vocational interests, self-efficacy, and achievement in the prediction of educational pathways. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(1), 61-74.

Plomp, T. 2013. Educational design research: An introduction. Dalam T. Plomp and N. Nieven (Penyunting), Educational design research (hlm, 10-51). Enschede: SLO Netherlands institute for curriculum development.

Rahayu, Sri. 2015. Mengoptimalkan Aspek Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Kimia UNY.

Riduwan, 2009.Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan, dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., and Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers and Education, 63, 259-266.

Rustaman, N.Y. 2013. Penilaian Otentik (Authenthic Assesment) dan Penerapannya dalam Pendidikan Sains.

Sariati, Dian. 2013. Analisis Keterampilan Proses pada Penggunaan Hirearki Inkuiri dan Dampaknya Terhadap Literasi Sains Siswa SMP. Tesis. UPI

Sellar, S. and B. Lingard. 2014. The OECD and Expansion of PISA: New Global Modes of Governance in Education (Journal). British EducationalResearch Journal. Vol. 40, No. 6, Desember 2014, 917-936.

Suwono, H., Mahmudah, A., and Maulidiah, L. (2017). Scientific Literacy Of A Third Year Biology Student Teachers: Exploration Study. KnE Social Sciences, 1(3), 269-278.

Widoyoko, E.P. 2009. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Wisnu.2012. Pentingnya Science Dalam Pendidikan.

Zuriyani, 2012.Literasi Sains dan Pendidikan.Makalah.

Zulyusri, Ramadhan Sumarmin dan Miswati.2017. Pengembangan Soal Biologi Berbasis Literasi Sains untuk Siswa SMA Kelas X Semester 1.Bioeducation Journal Vol.I No.1-Maret 2017.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Wilvi Eko Saputra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.