Students’ Perceptions Of Their Oral Skills Learning And Development: Current Situation And Future Orientations. A Case Study Of First Year Students Of English At ISL Gabes

Mohamed Hajjej

Abstract


Since 2006 Tunisian universities have operated under the Licence-Master-Doctorate, or “LMD,” system, whose introduction was the last important reform targeting higher education in Tunisia suggested by the European Union to its partners in the South (in particular the Maghreb countries) to bring their university system up to European standard

Adopting the LMD system in Tunisia as an educational and structural reform that adapts to European standards has been motivated by a desire to guarantee the scientific value of the Tunisian diploma and all that it encompasses as skills, to establish a flexible and efficient training model, of an academic and applied nature and equivalent at the international level, and to create a new generation of versatile graduates who adapt to a constantly evolving global context (Chabchoub, 2006).

Yet, hand in hand with the introduction of this system into higher education, the structure of university studies has undergone profound transformations regarding the quality of education, students’ learning;   teachers’ assessment of their students’ performance, the time spent on initial training, and the number of hours allocated to teaching practices… 

Taking these facts into consideration, the following paper sets out to gather data on students’ perception of the impact of such transformations on the learning and development of their oral skills, explore major challenges, and figure out key solutions. 


Keywords


LMD System, students’ learning, teaching practices, assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed). Pearson Longman.

Chabchoub, A (2006), Enseigner à l’université, Tunis : L’atured

Coleman, H. (2014). The English language in development. London: British Council.

Cotter, Ch. (2007). Speaking well - four steps to improve your ESL EFL students’ speaking ability. Retrieved March 12th, 2008 from: http://ezinearticles.com/?Speaking-Well----Four-Steps-To-Improve-Your-ESLEFL-Students-Speaking-Ability&id=631232

Crandall, J. (1999). Cooperative language learning and affective factors. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 226- 307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .

CUP. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. United States: Cambridge University Press.

Dornyei, Z. (2003).Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning 53 (S1), p14.

Halliday, M.K., 1978. Language as social semiotic. , Edward Arnold, London.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Philips, J. (2007). Speaking Technique. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

Rahman, M. M. (2010). The Factors Affecting Bangladesh’s Exports: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas, 44, 229-244.

https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.0.0075

Rao, VK. 2012. Techniques of Teaching English .Hyderabad: Neelkamal Publications.

Resnick, B.L. and Snow, C.E. (2009). Speaking and listening for preschool through third grade. NY: New Standards.

Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Third ed. London: Longman

Richard, J.C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rivera, J. (2010). Authentic Oral Interaction in the EFL Class: What it means, what it does not, Teachers` Professional Development, 12(1), 47-61.

White, J. (2004). Speaking, listening and learning materials. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and the National Literacy Strategy Journal. Retrieved August 25th, 2008, from: http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/Pubs/white.html

Zhang, S. (2009). The role of input, interaction, and output in the development of oral fluency. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 91–100.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v43.1.6045

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mohamed Hajjej

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.