PACTISS-ICT’: A New Global Teaching Model Of English For Specific Purposes (ESP)

Tshitenge Tshitenge Muyaya Bosco

Abstract


The teaching model called 'PACTISS-ICT' is an acronym of “Paired, active and communicative teaching integrating six skills”. It is the new model of teaching English for specific purposes (ESP); it is designed to go directly to the objectives of language learning in general, and in particular, a learning of foreign or second language. This teaching model is an innovation in this period of globalization where new information and communication technology is obligatory for all researchers. For this reason, ICT must already support the teaching and learning of English for learners, not only from the DRC but from the entire planet where English is developed as a second language and/or foreign language.

The PACTISS-ICT teaching model includes two areas of student research, namely (a) the student's discipline and (b) English relating to that area, i.e. English adapted to the student's area of research. However, instead of going there as the old high school English course program proposed it; PACTISS-ICT Model, directly and globally develops all skills in a single lesson at the same time while the learner is exposed to the English language where the teacher actively and technically facilitates teaching thanks to integrated six language skills all of this thanks to computer tools.

This model seems active and simple for all learners who, in a formal or informal teaching, will learn without the slightest effort because they already have one of these tools, among these tools mention should be made of simple telephone or android phones, memory cards, radio cassette, television, video sets which appear to be of great importance for the teaching of the English language as intended by the experts.


Keywords


PACTISS-ICT, ELT, ESP, Model.

Full Text:

PDF

References


BAILYSTOK, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 181-206.

BROWN, D.H. (2000) Principles of language learning and teaching, 4th Edition. Longman, Inc.

CHOMSKY, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

COOK, V. J. & M. Newson. (1996). Chomsky’s universal grammar: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

CRYSTAL, D. (2008) Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th Edition; Blackwell Publishing.

DEMİREZEN, M. (1988) Behaviorist Theory and Language Learning, Hacettepe Universitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. P135-140.

KRASHEN, S. D. (2004) Applying the Comprehension Hypothesis: some suggestions. Paper presented at 13th International Symposium and Book Fair on Language Teaching.

KRASHEN, S. D. (1985) The Input Hypothesis: issues and implications. London and New York, Longman.

KRASHEN, S. D. (1978) The monitor model for second language acquisition. In: Gingras, R. C. (Ed.) Second-language Acquisition & Foreign Language Teaching. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.p.1-26.

LANTOLF , J. P. and S. L. Thorne (2006) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. The Pennsylvania State University

LAVADENZ , M. (2011) From Theory to Practice for Teachers of English Learners. In The CATESOL Journal 22.1 • 2010/2011.

LEVY, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. New York: Oxford University Press.

NUTTALL, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Heinemann.

OPP-BRCKMAN, L. & S. KLINGHAMMER (2006) Shaping the Way We teach English: Successful Practices Around the World. Instructor’s Manual. Washington DC 20547. USA.

PIAGET, J. (1974). The child’s construction of quantities: Conservation and atomism (Trans. A. J. Pomerans). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

SÁROSDY, J. et al. (2006) Applied Linguistics I for BA Students in English, © Bölcsész Konzorcium. Minden jog fenntartva!

SUZANNE M. W. and PENELOPE L. P. (2006) Theories of Learning and Teaching What Do They Mean for Educators? National Education Association (NEA), Washington, DC 20036-3290.

TSHITENGE, T.M. (2019) Investigating EMP Content-Based Instruction and Curriculum Design in Medical schools: A Case Study. Unpublished thesis (PhD) Université de Kinshasa.

VYGOTSKY, L. (1987) Thought and language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

WANG, S. (2010)An Experimental Study of Chinese English Major Students’ Listening Anxiety of Classroom Learning Activity at the University Level. In Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 562-568.

WANG, X. (2010 ) Teaching Reform on Comprehensive English-in Light of John Dewey’s Pragmatism. In Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 717-720.

WANG, P. (2011) Constructivism and Learner Autonomy in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: To what Extent does Theory Inform Practice? In Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 273-277, March 2011.

WATSON, J. B.(1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia:

Lippincott.

YU, X. (2011) Exploring How to Ensure the Quality of Bilingual Education in Advanced Mathematics. In Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 312-314.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v43.1.6010

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Tshitenge Tshitenge Muyaya Bosco

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.