Validity And Reliability Tests To Determine Critical Indicators For Coconut Supply Chain Sustainability

sanusi sanusi, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Larisang Larisang, Abdul Hamid

Abstract


Today, the sustainability supply chain is one of the hottest discussions in the world among practitioners, academicians, and governments. Therefore, Indonesia is a developing country that also pays more attention to involvement. Indonesia has the most significant coconut production in the world, followed by India and the Philippines. However, based on previous research, the sustainability of the coconut in Indonesia is under threat to supply chain operation. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the crucial indicators of sustainable practices to measure the performance of a sustainable supply chain system. This study aims to assess an instrument's content validity and inter-rater reliability to determine a set of crucial key performance indicators (KPIs) for the sustainable supply chain coconut industry. Initially, this study reviewed the existing sustainable supply chain indicators and developed a list of indicators suitable for the coconut supply chain. Then, the indicators were assessed and validated by a group of five experts. The validity test was analyzed using Aiken's V indexes and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity test showed that the percentage of Aiken V, 60.78% (31 indicators) were valid, and 39.22% (22 hands) were invalid. In the inter-correlation coefficients test using a 95% confidence level, the ICC value obtained for the economic dimension is .743, categorized as moderate reliability; the environmental dimension is .684 (moderate); and the social dimension is .845, categorized as good reliability, and the average measure of the ICC value was .76 (good reliability). In conclusion, Aiken’s V index was used to determine the number of indicators. Only 31 could be further used as an instrument to determine the critical indicators for coconut supply chain sustainability in Riau Province-Indonesia.


Keywords


Aiken’s V, Content Validity, Sustainable Supply Chain, Reliability, Coconut.

Full Text:

PDF

References


E. Hassini, C. Surti, and C. Searcy, “A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042.

W. Piotrowicz, R. Cuthbertson, W. Piotrowicz, R. Cuthbertson, P. Management, and V. J. Marsick, “Performance measurement and metrics in supply chains: an exploratory study,” 2015.

A. Jellali and M. Benaissa, “Sustainable performance evaluation of the supply chain,” in 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport, IEEE ICALT 2015, 2015, pp. 151–156. doi: 10.1109/ICAdLT.2015.7136612.

N. Yakovleva, J. Sarkis, and T. W. Sloan, Sustainability indicators for the food supply chain. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2010. doi: 10.1533/9780857090225.3.297.

L. Manning and J. M. Soon, “Development of sustainability indicator scoring (SIS) for the food supply chain,” Br. Food J., vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 2097–2125, 2016, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2016-0007.

E. Kusrini and R. Primadasa, “Design of Key Performance Indicators ( KPI ) for Sustainable Supply Chain Management ( SSCM ) Palm Oil Industry in Indonesia,” vol. 02068, pp. 1–6, 2018.

I. Gunawan, D. Trihastuti, and I. J. Mulyana, “Sustainability Issues of the Coconut Supply Chain in Indonesia,” pp. 158–162, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ieem50564.2021.9672964.

Y. H. Meisyarah, S. Hartini, and F. Haryanti, “The Content Validity and Interrater Reliability of Nursing Outcome Classification Self-Care for Toileting among Children with Physical Disabilities,” vol. 11, no. August, pp. 255–267, 2021.

F. De Ciencias, B. Artes, U. Quind, L. Mar, and D. Burgos, “Measuring digital transformation in higher education institutions – content validity instrument transformation,” 2022, doi: 10.1108/ACI-03-2022-0069.

C. Alzaman, “Green supply chain modelling: Literature review,” Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 16–39, 2014, doi: 10.1504/IJBPSCM.2014.058891.

World Commission On Environment And Development, “Vol. 17 - doc. 149,” World Comm. Environ. Dev., vol. 17, pp. 1–91, 1987.

H. L. Lam, B. S. How, and B. H. Hong, “Green supply chain toward sustainable industry development,” in Assessing and Measuring Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Centre of Excellence for Green Technologies, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Selangor, Malaysia: Elsevier Inc., 2015, pp. 409–449. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-799968-5.00012-9.

P. Ahi and C. Searcy, “A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 52, pp. 329–341, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018.

M. A. Moktadir, Y. Mahmud, A. Banaitis, T. Sarder, and M. R. Khan, “Key performance indicators for adopting sustainability practices in footwear supply chains,” E a M Ekon. a Manag., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 197–213, 2021, doi: 10.15240/TUL/001/2021-1-013.

O. Narimissa, A. Kangarani-Farahani, and S. Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, “Evaluation of sustainable supply chain management performance: Indicators,” Sustain. Dev., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 118–131, 2020, doi: 10.1002/sd.1976.

V. Zamanzadeh, A. Ghahramanian, M. Rassouli, A. Abbaszadeh, and H. Alavi-, “Design and Implementation Content Validity Study : Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication,” vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 165–178, 2015, doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017.

H. A. Devon et al., “A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability,” pp. 155–164, 2007.

R. A. Carmines, E.G. and Zeller, “A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VA L I D I TY,” 1979.

L. Aiken, “Three coefficients for Analyzing The Reliability and validiy of Ratings,” 1985.

LAWSHE, “A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VA L I D I TY1,” 1975.

Guilford and B. Fruchter, “Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education,” 1978.

M. P. Portney, L.G. and Watkins, “Foundations of Clinical Research,” 2009.

V. Anculle-Arauco et al., “Content validation using Aiken methodology through expert judgment of the first Spanish version of the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI) in Peru: A brief qualitative report,” Rev. Psiquiatr. Salud Ment., no. xxxx, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2022.11.004.

S. Hendiani, H. Liao, and C. J. C. Jabbour, “A new sustainability indicator for supply chains: theoretical and practical contribution towards sustainable operations,” Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl., vol. 25, no. 4–5, pp. 384–409, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13675567.2020.1761308.

T. Popovic, “Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 180, pp. 748–768, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.142.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v41.1.5698

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 sanusi sanusi, Salleh Ahmad Bareduan, Larisang Larisang, Abdul Hamid

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.