The Use of Narrative and Metaphor in Intercultural Science Communication: An Analysis of Spoken Discourse in Japanese Science Q&A Programs

Kaoru Amino

Abstract


In Japan, as in many other countries, scientists whose work is publicly funded must communicate their results to the taxpayer. However, for many, this task is more difficult than speaking at conferences or writing journal articles. The present article demystifies the communication of science to non-specialist audiences by describing how experts on a Japanese radio program for elementary school students explained their research using communicative strategies linked to storytelling and metaphor. Several key storytelling strategies tailored to different audiences were observed, including chronological “hardship anecdotes” delivered by speakers, eliciting relevant experiential narratives from audiences, and the use of onomatopoeia to visualize scenes. Moreover, speakers used metaphors, examined the knowledge of questioners, and taught scientific approaches rather than knowledge. The results indicated the overall effectiveness of a communicative approach that personalizes and humanizes scientific knowledge into more familiar frames of reference. These strategies contextualized complex knowledge more immediately for non-experts, reducing the epistemic gap between them and the scientists. In terms of intercultural communication, the results show that overcoming epistemic differences via personalized, in-depth storytelling that focuses on hardship, analogy, and epistemic inquiry may also help novices readjust their communicative practices and adapt to novel cultures.


Keywords


Science communication, analogy, storytelling, epistemic status, high and low context culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Weingart, P. and Guenther, L. (2016). Science communication and the issue of

Trust, J. Commun. 15:5, 1-11. [Accessed November 16, 2021] https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a71c/528c24a785b072d14f6cf206ef1d17ba4200.pdf.

Hilgartner, S. (1990). The Dominant View of Popularization Conceptual Problems, Political Uses. Social Studies of Science 20, 519-539.

Science Council Japan, (2014). Proposal of investigation committee about the state of research funding. [Accessed December 22, 2022]

https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/member/iinkai/gakushikin/pdf23/gakushikin-siryo11-2-2.pdf

Trench, B. and Bucchi, M. (2010). Science communication, an emerging discipline, J. Commun. 9:3. [Accessed January 26, 2021]

http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/09/03/Jcom0903%282010%29C01/Jcom0903%282010%29C03

Grunig, J. E., and Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. (1989) Language has a heart. Text Talk 9:1, 7–25.

https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7

Ochs, E. (2002). “Becoming a Speaker of Culture,” in Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives, ed. C. Kramsch. New York: Continuum, 99–120.

Chafe, W. L. and Nichols-Chafe, J. (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

Heritage, J. (2012). “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” in Research on Social Interaction. 45(1), 1-29.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books.

Dal Zotto, C., and Lugmayr, A. (2016). “Media Convergence as Evolutionary Process,” in The Media Convergence Handbook Vol. 2: Media Business and Innovation, ed. A. Lugmayr, and C. Dal Zotto. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54487-3_1

Andrews, D. H., Hull, T. D., and Donahue, J. A. (2009). Storytelling as an instructional method: definitions and research questions. Interdisc. J. Prob.-Based Learning 3 (2).

Olson, R. (2018). Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style. Washington: Island Press.

https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/91852-tell-me-a-story

https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1063

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin.

Pinker, S. (2012). The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Penguin.

Miller, L. (2008) “Tell Me a Story:" Robert Krulwich's Commencement Speech at California Institute of Technology.

[Accessed November 15, 2021]

Hayashibara, A. (2012.) On saying and showing by metaphor: toward a sociological analysis of metaphor. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 425, 51–64.

http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120005325498

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Haru, Ka. (2017). Philosophical and cognitive linguistic study on metaphor [dissertation/doctoral thesis].

Holyoak, K. and Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Maiwald, K. O. (2005) Competence and praxis: sequential analysis in German sociology. The State of the Art of Qualitative Research in Europe/Innovations in Special Methods 6:3. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.21

Nakatani, K. (2003). “Analyzing -te,” in Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12, ed W. McClure, 377–387.

Keefe, J. W. (2007) What is personalization? Phi Delta Kappan 89:3, 217–223.

Varma, A. (2020). Evoking empathy or enacting solidarity with marginalized

communities? A case study of journalistic humanizing techniques in the San Francisco

Homeless Project. Journal. Stud. 1:12,1705–1723.

Swales, J. (1990). “The Concept of Genre,” in Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–67.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v36.2.5006

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kaoru Amino

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.