Normal Vs. Cesarean Delivery Ratio - The Main Reasons For Cesarean Delivery

Minire Alilaj - Beqiraj, Behrije Vishi, Nerxhivane Beqiri- Arifi

Abstract


Child delivery is a multi-dimensional process with physical, emotional, social, physiological, cultural, and psychological dimensions. Although cesarean delivery can be a life-saving surgery, this procedure should be performed only when medically indicated, as complications that have adverse consequences for the mortality and morbidity of both the mother and the newborn are well documented in the literature.

The main purpose of this paper was to determine the ratio of normal & cesarean delivery ratio by determining the main reasons for cesarean births in the Regional Hospital of Ferizaj, Kosovo

The study was retrospective, descriptive, conducted at the Regional Hospital of Ferizaj in Kosovo, for a period of three years (2018-2020).

Normal births in January 2018 were 87.30% while in December 2028 this number has decreased to 77.30%. In contrast to this decline, births by cesarean section have increased significantly from 12.60 % in January to 22.68% in December 2018. In 2019, the ratio of normal births compared to cesarean sections has had smaller movements. However, even this year there is a decrease in the number of normal births and an increase in those with cesarean section. In 2020, the number of normal births increased slightly from 75.2% in January to 78.8% in December. In this annual period there has been a decrease in births by cesarean section, registering 24.8% in January and 22.2% in December.

Based on these findings we can conclude that in the last two years of the analyzed period we have a decrease in births by cesarean section and an increase in births by normal ways.


Keywords


normal delivery, cesarian delivery, Hospital in Ferizaj, Kosovo

Full Text:

PDF

References


Latifnejad Roudsari, R., & Merghati Khoei, E. (2015). Vaginal Delivery vs. Cesarean Section: A Focused Ethnographic Study of Women's Perceptions in The North of Iran. International journal of community-based nursing and midwifery, 3(1), 39–50.

Jamshidi Manesh M, Oskouie SF, Jouybary L, Sanagoo A. (2009). The process of women’s decision making for selection of cesarean delivery. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2009;21:55–67

Negrini, R., da Silva Ferreira, R. D., & Guimarães, D. Z. (2021). Value-based care in obstetrics: Comparison between vaginal birth and caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), 333. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03798-2

Tadevosyan, M., Ghazaryan, A., Harutyunyan, A., Petrosyan, V., Atherly, A., & Hekimian, K. (2019). Factors contributing to rapidly increasing rates of cesarean section in Armenia: A partially mixed concurrent quantitative-qualitative equal status study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2158-6

Bhatia, M., Banerjee, K., Dixit, P., & Dwivedi, L. K. (2020). Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016. JAMA Network Open, 3(8), e2015022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15022

Baskett, T. F., & McMillen, R. M. (1981). Cesarean section: trends and morbidity. Canadian Medical Association journal, 125(7), 723–726.

Wendland C. L. (2007). The vanishing mother: Cesarean section and "evidence-based obstetrics". Medical anthropology quarterly, 21(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2007.21.2.218

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR (2016) The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0148343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

Paixao ES, Bottomley C, Pescarini JM, Wong KLM, Cardim LL, Ribeiro Silva RdC, et al. (2021) Associations between cesarean delivery and child mortality: A national record linkage longitudinal study of 17.8 million births in Brazil. PLoS Med 18(10): e1003791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003791

Antoine, Clarel and Young, Bruce K.. "Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly" Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 49, no. 1, 2021, pp. 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0305




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v31.1.4080

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Minire Alilaj - Beqiraj, Behrije Vishi, Nerxhivane Beqiri- Arifi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.