The Correlation Of A Scientific Approach Using The Probing Prompting Technique And A Problem-Based Learning Model On Learning Outcomes On Reaction Rate Material

Wardhatul Jannah, Ellizar Ellizar, Indang Dewata, Rahadian Zainul

Abstract


Abstract─This study began with the learning results on the subject of the still-low reaction rate. The purpose of this study is to discover the relationship between the scientific method and learning outcomes in the reaction rate material by using the probing prompting technique and the issue based learning model alone or combination. Quantitative research using correlational methodologies and a one-shot case study design is the approach of choice. Class XI MIPA SMAN 1 Padang and XI MIPA SMAN 14 Padang were the subjects of this research. A total of 144 persons were selected for the study using a simple random sampling technique. Questionnaires and learning outcomes assessments in the form of 22 objective questions that had been verified for validity and reliability were used in this study. The results found a positive and significant correlation between: 1) the scientific approach to learning outcomes using the probing prompting technique, with a correlation coefficient of 0.903 suggesting a very strong correlation. This suggests that by using the probing prompting technique, the scientific approach module can improve learning results by 81.5 percent. 2) A scientific approach to learning outcomes using a problem-based learning model with a correlation coefficient of 0.770, suggesting a strong link. This suggests that the scientific approach module, when combined with a problem-based learning model, has an effective contribution of 59.3 percent in improving learning outcomes. 3) Using the probing prompting technique and the issue based learning model together on the reaction rate learning outcomes yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.958, indicating a very strong correlation. The contribution of the two independent variables to the dependent variable in this study is 91.8 percent, with the remainder impacted by other variables.

Keywords─Scientific Approach; Probing Prompting; Problem-Based Learning; Learning Outcomes; Reaction Rate


Keywords


Scientific Approach; Probing Prompting; Problem-Based Learning; Learning Outcomes; Reaction Rate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hosnan, Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21, Kedua. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2014.

W. Jannah and Ellizar, “Validitas dan Praktikalitas Modul Larutan Penyangga Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik dengan Menerapkan Teknik Probing Prompting untuk Kelas XI SMA/MA,” Menara Ilmu, vol. XII, no. 12, pp. 101–111, 2018.

Ellizar, Pengembangan Program pembelajaran, 1st ed. Padang: UNP Press, 2012.

Nasution, Berbagai Pendeklatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar., 15th ed. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2011.

K. Jacobsen, D.A., Paul, E., donald, Methods for Teaching. USA: Person Education, 2009.

Guspatni, Andromeda, and Bayharti, “Peningkatan Aktivitas Menjawab dan Kualitas Jawaban Mahasiswa dengan Pertanyaan Prompting pada Mata Kuliah Strategi Pembelajaran Kimia Jurusan Kimia , FMIPA , Universitas Negeri Padang,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2018.

R. A. Sani, Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2015.

P. Sutanto, Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2017.

S. Nur, I. P. Pujiastuti, and S. R. Rahman, “Efektivitas Model Problem Based Learning ( Pbl ) terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Sulawesi Barat,” J. Saintifik, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 133–141, 2016.

A. Majid and C. Rochman, Pendekatan Ilmiah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

E. Kosasih, Strategi Belajar dan Pembelajaran Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Yrama Widya, 2014.

Enggen and Khauchak, Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Indeks., 2012.

T. S. Utami, D. Santi, and A. R. Suparman, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning ( PBL ) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Pederta Didik Kelas XI SMK Negeri 02 Manokwari ( Studi Pada Materi Pokok Konsep Laju Reaksi ) Kelompok Eksperimen Kontrol Post Test,” Arfak Chem Chem. Educ. J., no. ii, pp. 21–26, 2018.

Kemendikbud, “Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 TAHUN 2007 tentang standar Penilaian Pendidikan,” no. 20, 2007.

Purwanto, Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2011.

C. Munzenmaier and N. Rubin, “Bloom’s Taxonomy: What’s Old is New Again”. Santa Rosa The Elearning Guild Research, pp. 1-47,” 2013.

D. Latisma, Evaluasi Pendidikan. Padang: UNP Press, 2011.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v27.2.3256

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Wardhatul Jannah, Ellizar Ellizar, Indang Dewata, Rahadian Zainul

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.