The impact of noise on the results of automated slice sensitivity profile measurements in computed tomography

Elvira Rizqi Widyanti, Choirul Anam, Eko Hidayanto, Mohammad Haekal

Abstract


Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the impact of noise on full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of slice sensitivity profile (SSP) of computed tomography (CT) images which was automatically calculated using Matlab-based software on the AAPM CT performance phantom. Methods: The slice thickness part of AAPM CT performance phantom was scanned by the 128 slice GE Healthcare CT scanner with four different tube currents of 50 mA, 100 mA, 150 mA and 200 mA. The noise calculation was carried out on the homogeneous region of the phantom which contains water. The noise was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) within the region of interest (ROI). The automated measurement of FWHM of SSP was carried out on the middle stair object of the image. Results: The noises were 7.67, 5.95, 4.98, and 4.00 HU for tube currents of 50, 100, 150, and 200 mA, respectively. The FWHMs of SSPs were 5.5 ± 0.1, 5.3 ± 0.3, 5.4 ± 0,0, and 5.2 ± 0.1 mm for noises of 7.67, 5.95, 4.98, and 4.00 HU, respectively. The result of automated FWHM of image with noise of 7.67 HU was 5.5 mm and the difference from the nominal slice thickness was 10%. The FWHM of image with noise of 4.00 HU was 5.2 mm and the difference from set slice thickness was 4%. The automated FWHM results tended to be similar to the nominal slice thickness for lower noise. Conclusions:  The automated FWHM results tends to be similar to the nominal slice thickness for lower noise. Although the noise of 7.67 HU still produces an accurate FWHM of SSP, the results suggested to use low noise for measuring FWHM and SSP.

Keywords


Noise; SNR; automated SSP measurement; AAPM CT performance phantom; CT scanner.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kundra, V.; Silverman, P.M. 2003; Impact of multislice CT on imaging of acute abdominal disease. Radiol Clin North Am, 41(6), pp. 1083-1093.

Mahnken, A.H.; Rauscher, A.; Klotz, E.; Mühlenbruch, G.; Das, M.; Günther, R.W.; Wildberger, J.E. 2007: Quantitative prediction of contrast enhancement from test bolus data in cardiac MSCT. Eur Radiol, 17(5), pp. 1310-1319.

Anam, C.; Fujibuchi, T.; Budi, W.S.; Haryanto, F.; Dougherty, G. (2018): An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 19(6), pp. 244-252.

Verduna, F.R.; Racinea, D.; Otta, J.G.; Tapiovaara, M.J.; Toroi, P.; Bochud, F.O.; Veldkamp, W.J.H.; Schegerer, A.; Bouwmand, R.W.; Giron, I.H; Marshall, N.W.; Edyvean, S. 2015: Image quality in CT: From physical measurements to model observers. Physica Medica, 31(8), pp. 823-843.

Anam, C.; Fujibuchi, T.; Haryanto, F.; Budi, W.S.; Sutanto, H.; Adi, K.; Muhlisin, Z.; Dougherty, G. (2019): Automated MTF measurement in CT images with a simple wire. Phantom Pol J Med Phys Eng, 25(3), pp. 179-187.

Anam, C.; Arif, I.; Haryanto, F.; Lestari, F.P.; Widita, R.; Budi, W.S.; Sutanto, H.; Adi, K.; Fujibuchi, T.; Dougherty, G. (2021): An improved method of automated noise measurement system in CT images. J Biomed Phys Eng, 11(2), pp. 163-174.

Anam, C.; Adi, K.; Sutanto, H.; Arifin, Z.; Budi, W.S.; Fujibuchi, T.; Dougherty, G. 2020: Noise reduction in CT images using a selective mean filter. J Biomed Phys Eng. 10(5), pp. 623-634.

Goldman, L.W. (2002). The essential physics of medical imaging. Second Edition. Lippincott Williams and Walkins: Philadelphia.

Primak, A.N.; McCollough, C.H.; Bruesewitz, M.R.; Zhang, J.; Fletcher, J.G. (2006): Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. Radiographics, 26(6), pp. 1785-1794.

American Assosiation of Physicists in Medicine. (2013). Spesification and acceptance testing of computed tomography scanners. AAPM Report 39, USA.

Seeram, E. (2001). Computed tomography: Physical principles, clinical application and quality control. WB Sounders: Pennsylvania, USA.

BAPETEN. (2018). Uji kesesuaian pesawat sinar-X radiologi diagnostik dan interkonvensional. Regulation of the Head of Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia, No. 2 of 2018.

Greene, T.C.; Rong, X.J. 2014: Evaluation of techniques for slice sensitivity profile measurement and analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 15(2), pp. 281-294.

Narita, A.; Ohkubo, M.; Fukaya, T.; Noto, Y. (2021): Technical Note: A simple method for measuring the slice sensitivity profile of iteratively reconstructed CT images using a non-slanted edge plane. Med Phys. 48(3), pp. 1125-1130

Jiang, H. (2001): Investigation of the slice sensitivity profile for step‐and‐shoot mode multi‐slice computed tomography. Med Phys, 28(4), pp. 491-500.

Sofiatun, S.; Anam, C.; Zahro, U.; Rukmana, D.; Dougherty, G. (2020). An automatic measurement of image slice thickness of computed tomography. International Conference and School on Physics in Medicine and Biosystems.

Goto, M.; Tominaga, C.; Taura, M.; Azumi, H.; 4 , Sato, K.; 5 , Homma, N.; Mori, I. (2019): A method to measure slice sensitivity profiles of CT images under low contrast and high-noise conditions. Physica Medica, 60(4), pp.100-110.

Feng, X.; Yongming, Z.; Gang, P.; Huizhi, C.; Jingmin, L.; Renqiang, Y.; Shengkun, P.; Huan, T. (2012): Correlation between the tube current and image noise in low-dose chest CT scan. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection. 32(1), pp. 100-103.

Anam, C.; Sutanto, H.; Adi, K.; Budi, W.S; Muhlisin, Z.; Haryanto, F.; Matsubara, K.; Fujibuchi, T.; Dougherty, G. (2020): Development of a computational phantom for validation of automated noise measurement in CT images. Biomed Phys Eng Express, 6, pp. 065001.

Nosratieh, A.; Yang, K.; Aminololama-Shakeri, S.; Boone, J.M. (2012): Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT. Med Phys, 39(12), pp. 7254-7261.

Christianson, O.; Winslow, J.; Frush, D.P.; Samei, E. (2015): Automated technique to measure noise in clinical CT examinations. Am J Roentgenol, 205(1), W93-W99.

Solomon, J.B.; Li, X.; Samei, E. (2012): Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. American Journal of Roentgenology, 200(3), pp. 592-600.

Morsbach, F.; Zhang, Y.H.; Martin, L.; Lindqvist C.; Brismar, T. (2019): Body composition evaluation with computed tomography: Contrast media and slice thickness cause methodological errors. Nutrition, 59, pp. 50-55.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v26.2.3110

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Elvira Rizqi Widyanti, Choirul Anam, Eko Hidayanto, Mohammad Haekal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.