The Success Of Team Collaboration In Supporting Systems For Development Of Project Management Learning Model

Adi Bandono

Abstract


The development of a learning model cannot be developed individually, without careful planning, strong leadership, effective and efficient organization, and continuous monitoring and evaluation. The success of a lesson is largely determined by the effectiveness, efficiency, and attractiveness of learning. The problem under study is how to determine several success criteria that affect collaboration from various parties as a supporting system in producing an effective, efficient, and attractive learning model at the Indonesia Naval Technology College (STTAL). The research method used is a combination method, a combination of qualitative and quantitative, with the process of collecting data through interviews and questionnaires to six experts in charge of developing learning models at the Indonesia Naval Technology College. Meanwhile, data analysis used Delphi and Borda techniques. The results showed that the six successes of collaboration in the formulation of learning models at the Naval College of Technology lie in the success of the team in building a shared commitment to one vision (17.4%), the intrinsic motivation that encourages a willingness to collaborate (12.5%). High Order Thinking (HOTS) ability (12.5%) which affects the accuracy in solving problems, managerial and leadership (10.3%) which affects the governance or project managerial ability, supporting infrastructure (9.6%), and budget (9%).


Keywords


Learning model, Successful Team Collaboration, Combination Methods, Delphi, Borda

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afzaal, S., Siau, N. Z., & Suhali, W. S. (2019). Evaluating Students’ Personality and Learning Styles in Higher Education: Pedagogical Considerations. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 145-164.

Akbar, M. M. (2013). Three Competing Models on Customer Loyalty in the Context of Mobile Subscribers. International Journal of Marketing Studies.

Alammary, Sheard, & Carbone. (2014). Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40-54.

Amory, A. (2007). Game Object Model Version II: a Theoretical Framework for Educational Game Development. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51-77.

Angell, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Journal Computers and Education, 383-398.

Ayesha, N., Salem, R., Quadri, M. S., & Al-Hamdan, N. (2011). Learning style preferences of medical students: A single institute experience from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Medical Education, 70-73.

Bandono, A., Bastari, A., & Suharyo, O. S. (2020). Effectiveness Naval Collaboration Flexible Learning (NCFL) Model in Increasing Learning Outcomes The Indonesian Naval Technology College. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 334-342.

Bandono, A., Rahman, A., & Suharyo, O. S. (2020). The Application Model of Naval Collaboration Flexible Learning (NCFL) in the Indonesian Naval Technology College: A Case Study. International Journal of ProgressiveSciences and Technologies, 498-505.

Bunce, D. (1996). The Quiet Revolution in science Education-Teaching Science The Way Students Learn. Journal of College Science Teaching, 169-171.

Erdal, Y., Kiziltepe, Z., Seggie, F. N., & Sekerler, S. (2014). The Learning Styles and personality traits of undergraduate: A case at a state university in Istanbul. The Anthropologist, 591-600.

Fariyatul, E., & Bandono, A. (2017). The use of value clarification technique-based- picture story media as an alternative media to value education in primary school. Harmonia Journal of art Research and Education, 68-74.

Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. . Journal of Technology Education, Digital Library and Archives, (Online), Vol. 7, No. 1.

Grgurovic, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. Journal ReCALL, 165–198.

Haverila, M. (2010). Factors related to perceived learning outcomes in e-Learning. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 308-328.

Ishida., R. (2017). Borda count Method for Fiscal Policy. Policy Research Institute Discussion Paper, 7-17.

Jiang, M., Parent, S., & Eastmond, D. (2006). Effectiveness of web-based learning opportunities in a competency-based program. International Journal on E-Learning, 353-360.

Kharb, P., Jindal, P. S., & Singh, V. (2013). The learning styles and the preferred teaching-learning strategies of first-year medical students. .Journal of, 1089-1092.

Mashudi, A., Rahman, A., Bandono, A., & Hasan, S. (2019). STTAL Development Strategy To Produce Human Resources That Acknowledge Technology Facing The Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. International Journal Of Asro-Sttal, 27-33.

Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. (1983). The Elaboration Theory of Instruction, in Reigeluth, C.M., (Ed). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of their current status. 335-381. . Hillsdale, NJ. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sandanayake, T. C. (2019). Promoting open educational resources-based blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher education, 1-16.

Siggh, & Puja, K. (2017). A Study on infrastructure and organizational learning: Rethinking knowledge performances perspective. International Journal of Social Sciences, 61-77.

Voramontri, D., & Klieb. (2018). Impact of Social Media on Consumer Behaviour. International Journal of.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v24.1.2543

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Adi Bandono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.