Understanding The Key Determinants Of Cattle Business Insurance Adoption In Gowa Regency, Indonesia

Muhammad Basir Paly

Abstract


Abstract: Cattle Business Insurance (CBI) is very important for mitigating risks such as death, disease outbreaks, natural disasters, and theft, which often harm farmers. This study aims to understand the key determinants influencing CBI adoption. Using a survey method with a sample of 100 farmers, consisting of 50 adopters and 50 non-adopters, the variables measured include age, experience, cattle ownership, family labor, and interaction with extension workers. Data were analyzed using logistic regression. The results show that age, experience, and interaction with extension workers have positive and significant effects on CBI adoption, with odds ratios of 1.022, 3.191, and 5.012, respectively. This means each unit increase in age, experience, and interaction raises the likelihood of adoption by 1.022, 3.191, and 5.012 times, respectively. These variables are categorized as key determinants. Conversely, cattle ownership and family labor are not significant and are therefore considered non-determinants, as they are perceived by farmers as irrelevant to the risks faced. The study concludes that CBI adoption is related to age, experience, and extension worker interaction, as well as farmers' understanding and perception of risk. Future research should identify and analyze farmers' risk perceptions in relation to CBI adoption.


Keywords


adoption, cattle insurance, determinan

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. Fadhil, Z. Hanum, and M. Yunus, “Sistem Pengembangan Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi/Kerbau di Provinsi Aceh,” J. Ilmu Pertan. Indones., vol. 26, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.18343/jipi.26.4.569.

N. A. Pratiwi and A. Ermanda, “Willingness to Pay Peternak terhadap Program Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi di Kabupaten Polewali Mandar,” J. Sains dan Teknol. Peternak., vol. 5, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.31605/jstp.v5i1.2975.

P. Mirah and K. Dewi, “Prilaku Peternak Terhadap Asuransi Ternak Sapi Kasus Di Kelompok Tani Ternak (Ktt) Karya Padang Kerta Desa Apuan, Kecamatan Baturiti, Kabupaten Tabanan,” dwijenAGRO, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019.

C. C. Arsih, F. Madarisa, and G. Thaib, “Proses adopsi program asuransi usaha ternak sapi/kerbau (AUTS/K) di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan,” J. Niara, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 91–100, 2021.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, “Asuransi usaha tani padi asuransi usaha ternak sapi asuransi perikanan pembudidaya ikan kecil,” Jakarta (ID), 2021.

K. Pertanian, “Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi Dan Kerbau ( Autsk ),” 2021.

Amir, “Pemkab Gowa Target Asuransi Sapi 4.000 Ekor Pertahun Artikel ini telah diterbitkan di halaman SINDOnews.com pada Kamis, 21 Februari 2019 - 13:07 WIB oleh Herni Amir dengan judul ‘Pemkab Gowa Target Asuransi Sapi 4.000 Ekor Pertahun - SINDO Makassar’. Untu,” Pemkab Gowa Target Asuransi Sapi 4000 Ekor Pertahun. Accessed: Jun. 12, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://daerah.sindonews.com/artikel/makassar/21580/pemkab-gowa-target-asuransi-sapi-4000-ekor-pertahun

A. Annisa, M. Ridwan, and T. Rasyid, “Analysis of farmers satisfaction on the services quality of cattle insurance program in Manuju District, Gowa Regency,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 492, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012136.

A. Yunianto, H. Sambodo, and B. Barokatuminalloh, “Tingkat Partisipasi dan Faktor yang Memengaruhi Partisipasi Peternak Dalam Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi (AUTS) di Kabupaten Banyumas,” J-MAS (Jurnal Manaj. dan Sains), vol. 7, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.33087/jmas.v7i2.586.

M. S. S Bherliana, “TINGKAT PARTISIPASI PETANI DALAM PROGRAM ASURANSI USAHATANI PADI (AUTP) DI KECAMATAN PALAS KABUPATEN LAMPUNG SELATAN,” 2023, UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG.

I. Fauziah and A. W. Utami, “Kesediaan Peternak Membayar Premi Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi/Kerbau Di Kabupaten Wonogiri, Jawa Tengah,” J. Agro Ekon., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jae.v40n2.2022.111-121

Ilmawati, M. Mahmud, and Syamsinar, “Motivasi Peternak Dalam Mengikuti Program Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi (AUTS),” Tarjih Agribus. Dev. J., vol. 1, no. 01, 2021, doi: 10.47030/agribisnis.v1i01.49.

N. Maria, F. Kusnadi, and F. Kristiani, “Pemodelan Premi Asuransi Bencana Kematian pada Ternak Sapi dengan Pengaruh Fatal Shock,” Limits J. Math. Its Appl., vol. 19, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.12962/limits.v19i2.9027.

M. H. Susanto, W. Azwar, and M. H. Miftakhul Marwa, “Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi: Implementasi dan Tinjauan Hukum Asuransi,” Indones. Law Reform J., vol. 1, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.22219/ilrej.v1i2.17098.

D. Utami Suryaningsih, “Tinjauan Yuridis Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi dalam Mena,” 2018.

I. Ghzali, No Title, Pertama. Semarang: UNDIP-Press, 2014.

W. H. Susilo, Metodologi Penelitian untuk Mahasiswa Farmasi, Pertama. Jakarta: Trans Info Media (TIM), 2016.

Y. Ardiansyah, “HUBUNGAN ANTARA SIKAP DENGAN ADOPSI PETERNAK TERHADAP PROGRAM ASURANSI USAHATANI SAPI (AUTS),” MAHATANI J. Agribisnis (agribus. Agric. Econ. Journal), vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.52434/mja.v6i1.2817.

T. Simamora and O. W. Matoneng, “Karakteristik Peternak, Sifat dan Proses Adopsi Inovasi Peternakan Sapi Potong di Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara (TTU),” JAS, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2024.

M. R. Fisher, D. Brady, R. Friedman, and M. Reid, “The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,” New Palgrave Dict. Econ., pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5.

G. Xie, J. Zhang, and K. K. Lai, “Risk avoidance in bidding for software projects based on life cycle management theory,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 24, no. 6, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.004.

T. Dalhaus, B. J. Barnett, and R. Finger, “Behavioral weather insurance: Applying cumulative prospect theory to agricultural insurance design under narrow framing,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–25, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232267.

K. Kitagawa, “Disaster risk reduction activities as learning,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 105, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04443-5.

V. Vapnik, “Principles of risk minimization for learning theory,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, 1992.

Z. Lamarang, B. F. J. Sondakh, A. K. Rintjap, and A. A. Sajow, “Peranan penyuluh terhadap pengambilan keputusan peternak dalam adopsi inovasi teknologi peternakan di Kecamatan Sangkub Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Utara,” Zootec, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 496–507, 2017.

C. Yoon, D. Lim, and C. Park, “Factors affecting adoption of smart farms: The case of Korea,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 108, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106309.

N. Adnan, S. M. Nordin, M. A. Bahruddin, and A. H. Tareq, “A state-of-the-art review on facilitating sustainable agriculture through green fertilizer technology adoption: Assessing farmers behavior,” 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.040.

J. W. Dearing and J. G. Cox, “Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice,” Health Aff., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 183–190, 2018, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104.

A. Sani, “The role of information and interaction processes and participatory rural communication appraisal in enhancing the acceptance of diffusion of innovation theory,” ~ 19 ~ Int. J. Adv. Mass Commun. Journal., vol. 3, no. 2, 2022.

Y. Permanasari et al., “FAKTOR DETERMINAN BALITA STUNTING PADA DESA LOKUS DAN NON LOKUS DI 13 KABUPATEN LOKUS STUNTING DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2019,” Penelit. Gizi dan Makanan (The J. Nutr. Food Res., vol. 44, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.22435/pgm.v44i2.5665.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v46.1.6511

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Basir Paly

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.